Chapter 7
THE SIN-PRINCIPLE CONDEMNED TO DEATH
"There is there
fore now no condemnation to them that are in Christ Jesus ... For the
law of
the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus made me free from the law of the sin
[principle] and of the death.
For what the law could not do, in that it was, weak through the flesh,
God sending His own Son in
the likeness of sinful flesh, and [as an offering] for sin, condemned
the sin [principle] in the flesh:
that the requirements of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not
after the flesh, but after the
Spirit" (Romans 8:1-4, Accurate translation) .
Paul is still
relating his experience. He has described in the seventh chapter his
bitter
bondage to the sin (depravity) dwelling in him, and the cry of despair
it occasioned. That is the
mournful wail of the seventh of Romans, Paul's experience trying to
live up to his law-ideal -- in
his own strength, without the help of Christ or the Holy Spirit, whom,
as yet, he did not know.
Some say that
that chapter is a picture of St. Paul's best, and of every Christian's
best!
Never! In that
passage there are up to verse 25 twenty-nine "I's"; "law" nineteen
times;
"sin" fourteen times; "me" ten times; "dead and died and death" seven
times, and no Christ and no
Holy Spirit. Is that a Christian experience? If so, then the naked
aborigines of Australia,
worshipping snakes and sacrificing to demons are Christians! Indeed, is
that the way St. Paul was
in the habit of describing his Christian experience? Emphatically not.
In the first seven verses of
the first chapter of this epistle, containing only one sentence, he had
eleven references to Christ.
His beloved Savior was "all." In Him He always triumphed, and was more
than conqueror. He
called God and men to witness "how holily and unblameably he walked
among men" (1 Thess.
2:10).
No, the eighth
chapter was the up to date Christian experience of St. Paul. It so
utterly
contradicts the experience of the seventh that they cannot both belong
to the same man at the same
time. There he was "carnal, sold under sin," a wretched captive tugging
at his chains; here he is
free. There he was trying to save himself; here he is already saved by
another. There he was
groaning; here he is shouting happy. There it was agonizing prayer;
here it is rapturous praise.
There he was hopelessly defeated; here he is victorious and more than
conqueror through Christ.
There it was dark despair; here it is cloudless hope.
In the sixth chapter Paul
exhibits sanctification and a life of holiness as provided for in the
atonement, both a blessed privilege and a solemn duty. In the eighth
chapter it is Paul's experience
and the possible experience of every Christian. It begins with no
condemnation and ends with no
separation from God.
Godet reports Spener as
saying, "If the Holy Scripture was a ring and the Epistle to the
Romans its precious stone chapter 8 would be the sparkling point of the
jewel." The Holy Spirit
brings Christ potentially into the Apostle's life, Who not only
justifies him but abides in him as a
new principle of death to the sin principle and life to God.
1. Christ justifies the
sinner. "There is, therefore, no condemnation to them that are in
Christ Jesus" (verse 1). He is fully justified, pardoned and restored
to the favor of God. He is also
adopted into the divine family, and the Holy Spirit bears witness to
the fact. "The Spirit himself
beareth witness with our spirit that we are children of God: and if
children, then heirs; heirs of
God, and joint heirs with Christ" (Rom. 8:16).
The phrase "In Christ Jesus"
means not a legal or federal union. It is a vital union, such as
Jesus described in the parable of the Vine and the branches, a living
relation, which passes the
holy life of Christ into us.
Mel Trotter, when a
helpless, hopeless drunkard, ready to go to hell for a drink, got saved
so completely and wonderfully that for years he became the leader of
Pacific Garden Mission in
Chicago. Wonderful Savior!
II. Verse 2. "For the law of
the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus made me free from the law of
the sin-principle and the death." Godet, the great French Commentator,
says, "Verses 14 describe
the restoration of holiness by the Holy Spirit. Sin entails death on
the justified, in whom it regains
the upper hand as well as on the unjustified" (8:12-13). There is
therefore only one way of
preventing sin from causing us to perish; that is, that it perish
itself. Grace does not save by
patronizing the sin but by destroying it.
The word "law" occurs in
this second verse twice. No one can rightly interpret the seventh
and eighth chapters of Romans without critically noting the sense in
which the word "law" is used
each time it occurs. In this verse it does not mean any statute, or
decree, or legislative enactment.
Dr. Maclaren says it means here "Constancy of operation." Godet calls
it "controlling power
imposing itself on the will." Dr. Steele says it means "Uniform
tendency." Dr. Barnes says it means
the influence of the sin (principle) and the death;" that is, if we
substitute any one of these phrases
for "law" we shall get the meaning of the verse: "The influence of the
Spirit of life in Christ Jesus
made me free from the influence of the sin (principle) and the death;"
that is, the moral death that
accompanies the sin (principle) .
That is the Apostle's
wonderful testimony of deliverance, which he gladly proclaimed to
the world. He believed that the power of the Holy Spirit which broke
the power of the sin
principle over him can deliver others too. In substance he confessed:
"The controlling power of
the Holy Spirit in one instant (aorist tense) made me free from the
influence or power of the sin
(principle) depravity. I tried intellectual methods; but found that
they could not free me from the
domination of carnality which had captured my passions and desires. I
whipped myself up to keep
the law of God; but I found that the proneness to evil would not loosen
its grip upon my being. I
tried every human resource, and all miserably failed. Nothing touched
the necessity of my case
until I heard of Jesus Christ. When I applied to Him He sent the Holy
Spirit who subverted and
expelled the tendency to sin, and set me free."
III. The law of God could
not do this. Hear St. Paul further; -- verse 3: "For what the law
[of God] could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God,
sending His own Son in the
likeness of sinful flesh and as an offering for sin, condemned [to
death] 'The Sin in the flesh.'"
"Law" in this verse means
the law of God, the moral law. This law could not justify or
sanctify, as Paul knew by sad experience. It condemned every kind of
sin, but could not save from
it. The flesh hindered it. "Flesh" (sarx) here means "the seat of
passion and frailty" and then
figuratively "the carnal and rebellious principle itself" (Adam Clarke)
. Human depravity fatally
hindered the law of God.
But "God sent His Son in the
likeness of sinful flesh." Christ took on Himself human nature
as God originally made it, without any sinful propensity. There was no
"he hamartia, the sin
principle" in it. Jesus came to do for us and in us what no written or
unwritten law of God could
accomplish.
Dear old Dr. Maclaren said:
"That life of Jesus, lived in human nature (in a human body)
gives a new hope of the possibilities of that nature lived in us. What
the man Christ Jesus was He
was that we may become. In the very flesh in which the tyrant (the sin
principle) rules, Jesus
shows the possibility and the loveliness of a holy life. He condemned
to death the sin in the flesh
as wholly unnecessary and no essential part of it."
Godet quotes Theophylact:
"He sanctified the flesh and crowned it by condemning to death
the sin (principle) and by showing that the flesh is not sinful in its
(essential) nature."
"But," someone asks, "do not
some teach that we must have sin in us"? and "No man can be
free from sin while in the mortal body, which sin must indwell us to
the last moment of our lives"?
Let there be no mistake about that: "It is ever taught at Keswick, as
in every part of God's Word,
that there are to the very last hour of our life upon earth powers of
corruption within every man
which defile his very best deeds and give even to his holiest efforts
the nature of sin." "We shall
never be sinless in this world." "We do not at Keswick make light of
those depths upon depths of
mischief that lie hidden within us."
Yes, we are compelled to
admit that this is the fundamental element, and warp and woof of
most Keswick teaching. And the "higher life" conventions in the East
repeat this same unscriptural
nonsense. And so do the Moody and Torrey Bible schools. Torrey says in
one of his books: "There
is not a line of Scripture that warrants the idea that the baptism of
the Spirit cleanses from inbred
sin I" Poor Torrey!
What about these texts:
1. Acts 15:8, 9 (R. V.),
"Giving them the Holy Spirit . . . cleansing their hearts by faith."
2. Rom. 6:18 (R. V.), "Being
made free from the sin [principle] ye became servants of
righteousness."
3. Rom. 6:27 (R. V.), "But
now [not at death] being made free from the sin [principle] . . .
ye have your fruit unto sanctification." That is exactly what
sanctification is -- deliverance from the
sin-principle.
4. Rom. 8:2 (R. V.), "Law of
the Spirit . . . made me free from the law of the sin."
5. I John 1:7, "The blood of
Jesus Christ His Son cleanseth us from all sin" v.9. "And to
cleanse us from all unrighteousness."
What can possess educated
men like Dr. Torrey to pervert and distort and deny the plain,
unmistakable meaning of such texts? And yet they pretend all the time
to be preaching holiness. But
observe, it is a new brand of modern holiness -- "Corrupt" holiness!
"Sinful" holiness! "Depths
upon depths of mischief" holiness! -- a kind the writers of the Bible
never heard of. Yet this moral
rubbish is being peddled out all over the English-speaking world, in
the interest of the father of
lies, to side-track true holiness, that cleanses the heart. See I
Thess. 5:23 and 2 Peter 1:4.
"Exceeding great and precious promises: that by these ye might be
partakers of the divine nature,
having escaped the corruption that is in the world through lust."
IV. What man could not do
and divine law could not do, Christ has done for us. Christ, by
His incarnation, provided for the pardon of sins, and the expulsion of
the sin principle. He baptizes
with the Holy Spirit, and by the entrance of the Spirit of holiness
into our nature, the great usurper
-- the sin principle -- is driven out, executed.
Clarke says: "The design and
object of the incarnation and sacrifice of Christ was to
condemn sin: to have it executed and destroyed -- to annihilate its
guilt, power and being in the
soul of a believer."
Godet says: "The
condemnation of the sin by Christ's life is the means appointed by God
for its destruction in ours."
Alford: "Sin is throughout
the passage an absolute principle. The Apostle is not speaking of
the removal of guilt, but of the practice of sin . . . by the new and
sanctifying power of the Spirit by
Christ. The context shows that the weakness of the law was its having
no sanctifying power. It
could arouse sin but could not cast it out." This noble quotation
endorses my whole argument, and
my translation, "the sin-principle" of the Greek noun for sin in the
singular number with the article
"the" before it. "The sin" occurs twenty-nine times in three chapters,
meaning always "the sin
principle." Sixteen of the world's greatest commentators endorse our
argument and translation and
do not leave Torrey and his Keswick friends an inch of standing. Bless
God! we have the truth, and
"the mind of Christ," and of the Spirit.
V. Notice the
results, v. 4. "That the ordinance of the law might be fulfilled in us
who walk
not after the flesh, but after the Spirit." Alford: "We must look for
the meaning of the word
'condemned' in the effects -- victory over sin, and casting out of Sin"
(the sin principle) . This is
very important to the right apprehension of the whole chapter, in this
part of which, not the
justification but the sanctification of Christians is the leading
subject. Christ's victory over the sin
is mine, by my union with Him, and participation in His Spirit. Whedon:
"The righteousness of the
law does not mean imputed righteousness, nor simply innocence, but an
actual and active personal
righteousness, energized by the Spirit." This does not sound much like
"Corruption holiness," does
it?
Dear Dr.
Maclaren wrote: "Remember the alternative. There must be condemnation
for us,
or for the sin that dwelleth in us. There is no condemnation for them
who are in Christ Jesus,
because there is condemnation for the sin that dwells in them. It must
be slain or it will slay us. It
must be cast out, or it will cast us out from God. It must be separated
from us, or it will separate us
from Him. We need not be condemned: but if it be not condemned, then we
shall be." In your case,
dear reader, which shall it be?
Oh, struggling
hearts, mourning over spiritual failures and defeats; falling below your
ideals, watching and weeping and striving in vain, do you want to keep
God's law, and live a
victorious life pleasing to Him? Then come in faith to Him who opened
the fountain for sin and
uncleanness. Come to Him who prayed that you might be sanctified, and
shed the blood that
cleanses from all sin. Come in faith, and you will not be disappointed.